![]() ![]() It requires alot more servicing than inline devices due to exposure to the tank environment (i.e will get clogged due to detritus etc.) It has more weaknesses compared to other methods. Ideally, you should aim to achieve a fine stream of mist. The most conventional device, it can be effective if used properly. Needs a good filter flow rate to operate well if used on the outflow line. Very efficient compared to atomizers/diffusers and for people that can't stand CO2 mist. Easy to tune and does not add additional stress on the filter. Requires far less frequent cleaning than in tank devices. Good ones produce a smoke-like fine mist. Clogs easily and require regular servicing to be stable. Additional item in tank distracts from tank aesthetics. The most conventional device it can be effective if used properly. Diffusing CO2 into the tank generally uses one of the following types of equipment: In-tank Diffuser/Atomizer
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |